(no subject)
Jun. 5th, 2003 10:27 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Dear members of
boy_touching,
I don't want to be rude, but I don't watch much TV. So if you're just going to tell me about some impossibly sexy thing I just missed, please don't post it to the community.
Unless you have pictures. Even of the participants alone. Then all will be well.



Edit: Found a picture from the MTV awards y'all brought up.

![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
I don't want to be rude, but I don't watch much TV. So if you're just going to tell me about some impossibly sexy thing I just missed, please don't post it to the community.
Unless you have pictures. Even of the participants alone. Then all will be well.



Edit: Found a picture from the MTV awards y'all brought up.

no subject
Date: 2003-06-05 10:45 pm (UTC)WHAT IS THIS?
no subject
Date: 2003-06-05 10:50 pm (UTC)Yayfangirlingat2inthefreakingmorningno subject
Date: 2003-06-06 12:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 08:43 am (UTC)I would do something rash if I could find Vincent boy touching. ~_~
no subject
Date: 2003-06-05 11:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-05 11:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 09:54 am (UTC)*jack
no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 10:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 12:02 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-06-06 12:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 04:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-05 11:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 12:04 am (UTC)It's not hard to find pictures of the people some of you like to discuss. All I'm asking is that you put a little thought into entries this many people see. Is that difficult to understand?
Re:
Date: 2003-06-06 12:23 am (UTC)Moving right along. While I understand your request, I find it laughable that you would expect the hundreds of members of this community to comply and change the way they post when you could simply turn your television on and, in this particular case, catch one of the thousand repeats MTV will broadcast this week of the movie awards.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 01:21 am (UTC)Nevertheless, I say again: I expect nothing at all. I'm not asking people to not post things. I'm asking them to provide those of us without a clue what they're talking about with a link.
I'd ask if that's difficult to understand, but you'd just take it as patronizing and you clearly don't understand anyway, so what's the point?
no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 12:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 12:11 am (UTC)Did you keep in consideration the people who DO watch TV? They could use the same argument to as to why people SHOULD mention it. It's not fair to censor for one person who chooses not to watch TV.
On that note, you have a really great icon.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 12:19 am (UTC)I never said don't talk about it. I just asked if you could provide some basic information about what you're talking about. Example: I have no clue who Steve-O or Bam are. But I'm certain they have webpages somewhere. If you want to squee about Steve-O and Bam, is it asking too much to provide a link to those webpages? Or at the very least mention their last names so I can IMDB them?
On that note, thanks! I'm very proud of it.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 12:24 am (UTC)Well, she did a FINE job. :D
no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 10:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 12:17 am (UTC)I wonder if the bag's mysterious secret is a manifesto detailing his torrid love affair with the Rifleman. That would be very, very sweet.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 01:06 am (UTC)So while I understand your complaint, I think you can probably get over one post that doesn't immediately relate to you. If not, sorry.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 01:19 am (UTC)I have no problem with a few empty posts. It's just when they begin to make up 2/3 of the community that you have to ask how much spam is too much.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 10:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 12:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 04:10 am (UTC)*drools over Sean William Scott's ARMS*
umf, i think i need to see this... *goes to switch on MTV*
no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 04:34 am (UTC)And I get what you're saying, but if you worded it a bit differently, things coulda been different. But that doesn't matter because you brought pictures ^___^
Byebye*
Alyssa J.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 09:09 am (UTC)And I'm going to have to agree with you... there's nothing more pointless (in my opinion) than a post saying, "Did anyone else see BlahBlahBlah? There were boys! They touched! So... this must be relevant in some way..." I mean, yeah, people are free to say what will, I suppose... but in the interest of etiquette, some of us are free to suggest that we would appreciate an accompanied visual reference or even a link of some sort so that we know what's being talked about...
Mmmph.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 09:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 02:38 pm (UTC)He's the one with the black hair. It may not look like it but that's him.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-13 02:24 am (UTC)also, i don't know about anyone else, but I like just HEARING about boy touching that happens on tv and stuff, it makes me giggle. i don't always need to see it, just knowing it happened is cool too. ha I'm a dork but whatever.